Saturday, 3 October 2026
KHOUNTOU.SNEvery citizen, an inspector

Khountou score methodology

The Khountou score summarises, on a scale of 0 to 100, how an administration handles citizen reports. It is recalculated every month from public, verifiable data.

Last updated: 12 May 2025

The 5 criteria and their weight

Each criterion is scored out of 100 then weighted; the total is 100%.

  • Reactivity

    Response speed

    Average time between the forwarding of a report and the first official response.

    20%
  • Resolution

    Ability to resolve

    Share of reports closed as resolved, confirmed by the citizen or by a verification.

    25%
  • Transparency

    Access to information

    Publication of responses, commitments and supporting documents.

    20%
  • Quality

    Clarity and relevance

    Clarity, relevance and accuracy of responses, rated by citizens.

    20%
  • Engagement

    Listening to citizens

    Follow-up of commitments made and interaction with citizens.

    15%

Score levels

The score out of 100 is translated into five levels, used across the platform.

  • Excellent

    80–100

    Fast responses, problems solved, information published.

  • Very good

    74–79

    Responsive service with a few points to consolidate.

  • Good

    68–73

    Regular responses but delays or follow-up could improve.

  • To improve

    50–67

    Partial or late responses, few resolutions.

  • Critical

    0–49

    Reports mostly left unanswered.

How the score is calculated

Each criterion is scored from 0 to 100, then weighted. The final score is the weighted average of the five criteria over the last 12 rolling months, with more weight given to recent months.

An administration must have received at least 10 reports over the period to be ranked; otherwise it is displayed as “not enough data”.

Data sources

  • Citizen reports submitted on the website and the mobile app (moderated).
  • Official responses published by administrations on their Khountou page.
  • Field verifications carried out by the Khountou team and partner correspondents.
  • Satisfaction ratings left by citizens once a report is closed.

Safeguards

  • Duplicate and abusive reports are excluded from the calculation.
  • Administrations can view the details of their score and request a review.
  • Any change to the method is announced one month in advance.

Map data

The maps of regions and departments are built from the administrative boundaries published by the geoBoundaries project.

Administrative boundaries: geoBoundaries — CC BY 3.0 IGO licence — Government of Senegal / OCHA ROWCA.

geoBoundaries